Proponents of the strategy outlined by Kevin Rudd argue that clear, proactive communication of consequences is the most effective way to prevent a conflict that no party truly desires. By focusing on 2028 as a critical window, policymakers are encouraged to accelerate necessary defense preparations and strengthen regional alliances, such as AUKUS. This approach is seen as essential for creating a credible deterrent that forces Beijing to reconsider the high costs of military aggression.
Supporters emphasize that ignoring the clear signals from Chinese military exercises would be a strategic failure. They argue that by defining the risks and the potential for conflict, the international community can better coordinate its economic and security policies. This transparency helps businesses and governments prepare for potential disruptions, ensuring that the global rules-based order is defended through strength rather than reactive measures.
Furthermore, this perspective holds that maintaining a strong US-led security presence in the Indo-Pacific is the only way to ensure that Taiwan remains self-governing. By linking military readiness with diplomatic engagement, allies can create a stable environment where competition is managed rather than allowed to spiral into war. For these advocates, the priority is to ensure that the cost of any potential invasion remains prohibitively high for the Chinese leadership.