Proponents of the police investigation argue that identifying the source of the leaked document is essential for protecting the rule of law and the integrity of the ICAC. When sensitive, unverified information is released to the public, it risks damaging the reputations of individuals who have not yet had the opportunity to respond to allegations in a formal setting. By treating this leak as a serious matter, authorities are reinforcing the principle that investigations should be conducted through official channels rather than through trial by media.
Furthermore, supporters emphasize that the security of information held by government and oversight bodies is paramount. If individuals within these organizations feel empowered to leak documents for political gain, it undermines the trust that the public places in these institutions. A thorough police investigation serves as a necessary deterrent, signaling that the unauthorized release of confidential material will be met with accountability. This approach protects the rights of those involved in the inquiry to a fair and impartial process.
From a practical standpoint, the investigation also helps to clarify the nature of the document itself. By determining how and why it was leaked, officials can better understand whether the information was intended to influence the outcome of the ICAC inquiry or to settle political scores. Ensuring that the investigative process remains shielded from external manipulation is a critical component of maintaining a healthy democracy where corruption can be addressed without the interference of partisan agendas.