Critics of Senator Pauline Hanson’s recent comments argue that her rhetoric is not only factually inaccurate but actively harmful to the safety of victim-survivors. By framing domestic violence as a "two-way street" and suggesting that victims should simply leave, they contend that she is perpetuating dangerous myths that have been debunked by experts. These critics emphasize that domestic violence is a gendered issue, with the vast majority of severe abuse and lethal violence perpetrated by men against women and children.
Accountability-focused groups, including the Australian Human Rights Commission, warn that such language undermines the work of frontline services and discourages victims from seeking help. They argue that when a high-profile political figure minimizes the severity of abuse, it reinforces the isolation and fear that keep many victims trapped in dangerous situations. For these advocates, the practical risk is that such comments normalize victim-blaming, making it harder for society to recognize the signs of coercive control and systemic abuse.
Moreover, critics point out that the suggestion to "just leave" ignores the reality of the housing affordability crisis and the lack of support services available to those fleeing violence. They argue that this advice is disconnected from the lived experience of thousands of Australians who face significant financial and safety barriers. By focusing on these simplistic solutions, they believe the senator is failing to engage with the structural changes needed to prevent violence, such as increased funding for shelters, legal support, and primary prevention programs.