News From Multiple Perspectives

Labor Party backs removal of telehealth barriers for assisted dying

Published July 24, 2026 at 9:03 PM UTC

Authored by
Every article published on DirectionFreeNews undergoes editorial review by our editorial team. Our editors research publicly available information from multiple trusted news organizations, compare differing perspectives, verify key facts, and publish balanced summaries intended to help readers better understand important events. Our editorial process is designed to reduce editorial bias by considering multiple reputable sources rather than relying on a single viewpoint

The Australian Labor Party has moved to address a significant gap in end-of-life care by committing to remove federal legal barriers that currently prevent the use of telehealth for voluntary assisted dying (VAD) services. During the party's national conference, delegates voted to support amendments that would allow doctors to use electronic communications, such as video calls or telephone consultations, to discuss VAD with patients. This decision aims to improve equity of access for Australians, particularly those living in regional and remote areas who often face immense physical and financial burdens to attend in-person appointments.

Currently, the Commonwealth Criminal Code Act 1995 prohibits the use of a carriage service to counsel or incite suicide. Because these laws were enacted long before VAD was legalized in any Australian state, they have created an unintended legal conflict. Health professionals currently risk criminal prosecution and significant fines if they use telehealth to discuss VAD, even though the practice is a legal and regulated medical service in every Australian state and the ACT. This has forced many patients to travel long distances while severely ill, or in some cases, has prevented them from accessing the service entirely.

While the party has formally backed the change, the government has also resolved to allow a conscience vote on the issue when it eventually reaches parliament. This approach acknowledges the deeply personal and ethical nature of the debate, ensuring that individual members are not bound by a party line. The move has been welcomed by advocacy groups and medical bodies, who argue that the current restrictions are outdated and discriminatory against those who cannot easily travel for care. As the government prepares to work on a private member's bill, the focus will remain on balancing the need for compassionate, accessible care with the existing safeguards that protect vulnerable individuals.