While the Premier frames the cabinet reshuffle as a move toward efficiency, critics argue that the abolition of key portfolios could undermine transparency and public accountability. By removing standalone roles for transport infrastructure and the Suburban Rail Loop, the government risks obscuring the progress and costs of major projects that are of significant interest to taxpayers. Without a dedicated minister, it becomes harder for the public and the media to track the specific performance and accountability of these high-stakes infrastructure investments.
Additionally, the removal of the cost-of-living and men and boys portfolios has drawn skepticism from those who believe these issues require focused, high-level attention. Critics suggest that spreading these responsibilities across all ministries may lead to a dilution of effort, where no single minister is held directly responsible for addressing these specific societal challenges. As the state approaches a November election, there are concerns that these changes are more about political optics than genuine policy improvement. The Opposition and other stakeholders remain wary that the reshuffle may fail to address the underlying issues facing Victorians, such as housing affordability and the need for clear, consistent leadership on critical social and economic concerns.