Proponents of President Steinmeier’s framing argue that acknowledging Germany as a country with a migration background is a vital step toward modernizing the nation's self-image. By officially recognizing that migration is not an external phenomenon but an internal reality, the government can better address the needs of a diverse citizenry. This approach is seen as essential for ensuring that all residents, regardless of their ancestral origins, feel a sense of ownership and responsibility toward the democratic state.
Supporters point out that the economic and cultural vitality of Germany is inextricably linked to its migrant history. From the labor force that helped rebuild the country to the current generation of entrepreneurs and professionals, those with migration backgrounds have been key drivers of German prosperity. Ignoring this contribution in the national narrative is viewed as a failure to acknowledge the reality of the modern German economy and social structure.
Furthermore, this perspective suggests that an inclusive definition of national identity is the most effective tool against extremist ideologies. When the state explicitly includes diverse groups in its definition of 'who we are,' it undermines the exclusionary rhetoric used by radical groups to sow division. This creates a stronger, more resilient society that is better equipped to handle the challenges of globalization and demographic change.
Ultimately, those who back this view believe that the President is providing the moral leadership necessary to guide Germany into the future. By embracing a more expansive definition of national identity, the country can move past the defensive postures of the past and focus on building a cohesive, forward-looking society that values the contributions of all its people.