Supporters of increased public funding for Deutsche Bahn argue that a modern, reliable railway is essential for Germany's climate and economic future. They point to the success of countries like Switzerland, where heavy state investment has produced one of the world's best rail systems. Without comparable funding, they say, Germany's network will continue to deteriorate.
Proponents note that rail is the most environmentally friendly mode of mass transport, and that shifting more trips from road to rail is a key part of the country's climate strategy. Investment in high-speed lines, digital signaling, and modern stations would make trains more attractive, reducing traffic congestion and emissions. They view the money as an investment in sustainability rather than a cost.
The argument also stresses that private operators are unlikely to take over the core network, which is inherently unprofitable but vital. Only the state can provide the long-term, large-scale capital needed for new tracks, bridges, and electrification. They point to the recent establishment of InfraGo as a step toward transparency, but insist it must be backed by billions in guaranteed funding.
Supporters caution against expecting quick fixes. They acknowledge DB's management problems but believe that reliable funding, combined with gradual reforms, will yield results. The alternative, they warn, is ever-worsening service, more people driving, and a failure to meet climate targets. For them, the choice is clear: invest now or pay a higher price later.