Advocates for NATO's new initiative argue that learning from Ukraine's combat experience is the most efficient way to improve alliance defense capabilities. The war has exposed critical gaps in Western weapons, such as vulnerability to drone swarms and electronic jamming. By using real data, NATO can avoid costly theoretical exercises and focus on proven solutions.
Supporters say the traditional procurement cycle, which can take a decade from concept to fielding, is no longer sufficient against fast-evolving opponents. Russia, for example, has rapidly adapted its electronic warfare and drone tactics during the conflict. NATO must respond with similar speed to maintain deterrence.
The approach also reduces costs, since resources are directed only toward technologies that have shown promise on the battlefield. Small and medium defense firms stand to benefit from new contracts focused on agile development. Soldiers would receive gear that has already been validated in conflict, potentially saving lives.
Moreover, the initiative strengthens NATO's unity by creating common standards and shared lessons. Allies with less combat experience gain access to critical knowledge. While some caution about risks, supporters believe the benefits of faster innovation outweigh the potential downsides, especially when facing an adversary that has already demonstrated willingness to use force against neighbors.