Proponents of a more assertive security policy argue that the current threats to Berlin require an immediate and significant increase in state authority and resources. They contend that the rule of law is being undermined by criminal clans and extremist groups that exploit gaps in the current system. By providing the police and judiciary with better funding, advanced surveillance tools, and more streamlined legal procedures, the state can more effectively dismantle these networks and deter potential attackers.
This perspective emphasizes that the primary duty of the government is to ensure the safety of its citizens. Supporters argue that reasonable people understand that in an era of evolving threats, such as lone-actor terrorism and international criminal syndicates, the state must be proactive rather than reactive. They advocate for a whole-of-government approach that integrates intelligence, law enforcement, and financial oversight to disrupt the economic foundations of criminal and extremist organizations.
Furthermore, advocates for this view suggest that a stronger state presence is necessary to protect the democratic values of the city. They argue that when the state fails to act decisively against those who openly challenge its authority, it creates a vacuum that allows extremism to flourish. By taking a firm stance, the government can reassure the public and prevent the normalization of violence, ultimately strengthening the social fabric of the capital.