Proponents of the BDI's stance argue that a proactive, defensive trade policy is essential to preserve the integrity of the European Single Market. They contend that the current influx of Chinese goods is not merely the result of market efficiency, but rather the outcome of massive state subsidies that distort global pricing. By advocating for stronger trade instruments, the BDI is attempting to level the playing field for German companies that must operate under strict environmental and labor regulations that their international competitors often ignore.
Supporters emphasize that the survival of Germany's industrial base is a matter of national security and economic sovereignty. If critical sectors like automotive and green technology are allowed to collapse under the weight of unfair competition, Germany risks becoming overly dependent on foreign powers for essential infrastructure. This perspective holds that government intervention is not an act of protectionism, but a necessary correction to ensure that global trade remains sustainable and reciprocal.
Furthermore, those backing this view point out that the European Union has the collective leverage to demand better market access and fair competition from Beijing. By speaking with one voice, European nations can prevent China from playing individual countries against one another. This strategy is seen as the only viable path to maintaining high-wage jobs and the social stability that has defined the German economic model for decades.