News From Multiple Perspectives

Ifo President Proposes Ending Reduced VAT on Food

Published August 6, 2026 at 7:02 AM UTC

Authored by
Every article published on DirectionFreeNews undergoes editorial review by our editorial team. Our editors research publicly available information from multiple trusted news organizations, compare differing perspectives, verify key facts, and publish balanced summaries intended to help readers better understand important events. Our editorial process is designed to reduce editorial bias by considering multiple reputable sources rather than relying on a single viewpoint

Clemens Fuest, the president of the Ifo Institute, has proposed the abolition of the reduced value-added tax (VAT) rate on food products in Germany. Currently, many food items are taxed at a lower rate of 7 percent, while the standard rate for most other goods and services is 19 percent. Fuest argues that moving all food products to the standard tax rate would simplify the tax system and generate significant additional revenue for the federal government.

The proposal comes as policymakers look for ways to address structural budget gaps and streamline the German tax code. By eliminating the lower tier for food, the government could theoretically close loopholes and reduce the administrative burden on businesses that currently must categorize products based on complex tax definitions. Fuest suggests that the resulting revenue could be used to lower other taxes or fund public investments.

However, the change would have a direct impact on consumer prices. If the tax rate on food were raised to 19 percent, the cost of basic groceries like bread, butter, and produce would likely increase. This shift would be felt most acutely by low-income households, who spend a larger portion of their monthly budget on food compared to wealthier citizens.

Economists and political analysts are now debating the feasibility of such a move. While the simplification of the tax code is a long-standing goal for many fiscal conservatives, the social implications of increasing the cost of living remain a major hurdle. The government has not yet signaled an intent to adopt this specific recommendation, but the debate highlights the ongoing tension between fiscal efficiency and social welfare.