Advocates for the new legislation argue that recognizing vicarious violence as an aggravating factor is a long-overdue step toward true justice for victims of gender-based violence. For years, the legal system often treated violence against children and violence against partners as separate issues, failing to see the strategic way abusers use children to maintain control. By linking these acts, the law finally acknowledges the reality of the psychological and physical terror that many families face.
Supporters emphasize that the suspension of parental authority is not merely a punitive measure but a vital protective one. When a parent is convicted of abuse, the primary duty of the state must be to ensure the safety of the children involved. Allowing an abuser to retain parental rights often forces victims to remain in contact with their tormentors, creating a cycle of fear that can last for years. This reform provides a clear legal mechanism to sever that link and prioritize the child's environment.
Furthermore, proponents suggest that this change will provide judges with the necessary tools to make consistent rulings. Previously, the interpretation of parental rights in abuse cases could vary significantly, leading to unpredictable outcomes for families. A standardized approach ensures that the severity of the crime is reflected in the legal consequences, sending a strong message that using children as weapons will not be tolerated by the state.
Ultimately, this reform is seen as a victory for children's rights and gender equality. By removing the power of the abuser, the law creates a safer path for survivors to rebuild their lives without the constant threat of manipulation. It represents a modern, evidence-based approach to family law that puts the welfare of the most vulnerable members of society at the center of the judicial process.