Proponents of the new Gibraltar agreement argue that the removal of the border fence is a vital step toward economic integration and social stability for the Campo de Gibraltar. By eliminating the daily bottleneck of customs and passport checks, the treaty directly improves the quality of life for thousands of Spanish workers who rely on the territory for their livelihoods. This shift is seen as a pragmatic solution that prioritizes the well-being of citizens over the symbolic weight of historical disputes.
From this perspective, the deal represents a triumph of diplomacy over isolationism. By bringing Gibraltar into the Schengen area and establishing a customs union, the agreement creates a framework for shared economic growth. Supporters point out that the previous system of border controls was not only inefficient but also a constant source of friction that hindered local businesses and tourism. The new arrangement, which includes a social fund to promote cohesion and training, is viewed as a proactive investment in the region's future.
Furthermore, advocates emphasize that this move does not require Spain to abandon its historical sovereignty claims. Instead, it demonstrates that two parties can find common ground on practical issues like movement and trade without resolving the underlying territorial disagreement. By focusing on shared prosperity, the government is effectively turning a historical point of contention into a bridge for cooperation, ensuring that the region is no longer held hostage by the political tensions of the past.