Proponents of Ryanair’s position argue that lowering airport taxes is a necessary step to unlock the full economic potential of Spain’s regional infrastructure. By reducing fees, the government could incentivize airlines to open new routes, thereby increasing passenger traffic and stimulating local tourism in areas that currently suffer from limited connectivity. Supporters emphasize that the current model, which keeps many regional terminals underused, represents a missed opportunity for regional development and job creation.
From this viewpoint, the focus on short-term dividend returns for Aena’s shareholders is short-sighted. Advocates for lower taxes point to the success of other European countries that have adjusted their aviation policies to attract more flights, suggesting that Spain should follow suit to remain competitive against emerging markets like Albania, Turkey, and Morocco. They argue that a more flexible pricing strategy would not only benefit the airline industry but also provide a significant boost to the broader Spanish economy by integrating smaller cities into the international travel network.
Furthermore, supporters of this stance highlight that the airline industry is highly mobile. If Spain maintains high costs, airlines will naturally redirect their capital and aircraft to more favorable environments. By aligning with the recommendations of market regulators like the CNMC, which have previously suggested lower fee structures, the government could foster a more dynamic aviation sector. This approach would prioritize long-term growth and connectivity over the immediate revenue generated by high airport charges, ultimately creating a more sustainable and prosperous future for Spain's regional airports.