Proponents of the amnesty law argue that it is a pragmatic and necessary step toward healing the deep political divisions that have persisted since the 2017 Catalan crisis. By removing the threat of criminal prosecution for those involved in the independence movement, the government aims to foster a new era of dialogue and cooperation. Supporters believe that legal conflict should not be the primary mechanism for resolving political disputes, and that a fresh start is essential for the long-term stability of both Catalonia and Spain as a whole.
From this viewpoint, the amnesty is not an attack on the judiciary but a legitimate exercise of legislative power intended to address a unique political situation. Advocates point out that similar measures have been used in other democracies to resolve internal conflicts and move past periods of civil unrest. By normalizing relations with regional parties, the government can focus on broader national issues, such as economic growth and social policy, rather than remaining trapped in a cycle of litigation and confrontation.
Furthermore, supporters emphasize that the law is a result of democratic negotiation within the Spanish parliament. They argue that the mandate provided by the electorate allows the government to pursue policies that prioritize political solutions over punitive ones. For these stakeholders, the European Court of Justice's involvement is seen as a procedural step that will ultimately confirm that Spain has the authority to manage its internal political affairs through legislative consensus.