Proponents of the government's intervention argue that the rescue of Plus Ultra was a necessary measure to protect jobs and maintain connectivity in the aviation sector during an unprecedented global crisis. The state-funded aid was designed to prevent the collapse of companies that were deemed vital to the national economy, and supporters maintain that the selection process was conducted in accordance with the established legal framework for emergency relief.
From this perspective, the involvement of high-level figures is often framed as part of the normal diplomatic and economic outreach required to navigate complex international business relationships. Supporters emphasize that the airline's survival was a priority for the government to ensure that Spain retained its operational capacity in key markets, particularly those involving Latin American routes. They argue that the focus on political connections is a distraction from the primary goal of economic preservation.
Furthermore, those backing the decision point out that the aid was subject to oversight by the state industrial holding company, SEPI, which is tasked with evaluating the viability of companies before granting support. They contend that the airline met the technical requirements for solvency and strategic importance, and that the subsequent legal challenges are politically motivated attempts to undermine the administration's economic recovery efforts. For these stakeholders, the priority remains the stability of the transport sector and the protection of the workforce employed by the airline.