Opposing US strikes and threat to seize Iranian assets

The US strikes and the threat to use Iranian funds for compensation dangerously escalate tensions without offering a path to de-escalation. Military action risks a broader conflict that could engulf the region and disrupt oil supplies, hitting European economies, including Spain, with higher energy prices. Using Iranian assets may be seen as a seizure of state funds, potentially violating international norms and undermining trust. This approach sidelines diplomacy at a time when dialogue is sorely needed. The tanker damages, while serious, could have been addressed through international arbitration or multilateral talks. Instead, the US unilateral action may provoke Iranian retaliation, endangering more ships and civilians. For Spain, the instability threatens energy security and could lead to economic fallout. Rather than solving the problem, the strikes create new uncertainties. A more measured response—such as increased diplomatic pressure and coalition efforts—would have been wiser. The current path carries risks that outweigh any short-term gains.