Proponents of granting pardons to officials like Laura Borràs argue that such actions can serve as a means to promote political stability and reconciliation. They contend that the legal system's punitive measures have been sufficiently enforced, and that pardoning individuals who have served their sentences or demonstrated remorse can facilitate healing and unity within the political landscape.
In the case of Borràs, supporters suggest that the partial pardon recommended by the TSJC, which would suspend her prison sentence while maintaining other penalties, is a reasonable compromise. They believe this approach acknowledges the legal consequences of her actions while allowing her to continue contributing to the political sphere, potentially aiding in bridging divides within Catalan politics.
Additionally, advocates argue that pardons can be a strategic tool for the ruling government to strengthen alliances and secure legislative support. By pardoning key figures from coalition partners or opposition parties, the government may foster goodwill and cooperation, which can be crucial for passing legislation and maintaining a stable governance framework.
However, this perspective also acknowledges the need for transparency and clear criteria in the pardon process to prevent perceptions of favoritism or political maneuvering. Ensuring that pardons are granted based on consistent and justifiable grounds is essential to maintain public trust in the political system.