Proponents of the current administration argue that the recent political changes are essential for maintaining national sovereignty and preventing foreign-backed instability. From this viewpoint, the decision to end elections is a defensive measure against what the government describes as 'traitors' and 'coup plotters' who seek to undermine the country's progress. By eliminating the electoral cycle, the government aims to prevent the influence of external actors, particularly the United States, which the regime accuses of meddling in Nicaraguan affairs to install puppet governments.
Supporters emphasize that the current leadership has provided a level of stability and economic continuity that was absent during previous periods of political volatility. They argue that the opposition, often fragmented and reliant on foreign funding, does not represent the interests of the average Nicaraguan. By consolidating power, the government claims it can more effectively implement long-term social and economic policies without the disruption of constant political campaigning and the risk of regime change that could reverse the gains of the Sandinista movement.
Furthermore, the establishment of a co-presidency is viewed by loyalists as a pragmatic solution to ensure a unified and efficient executive branch. By aligning the military, police, and judiciary under a single, cohesive leadership structure, the state can better manage internal security and social order. For those who prioritize national unity and the preservation of the revolutionary legacy, these measures are seen as a necessary evolution of the state to protect the country from the chaos and polarization that have historically plagued the region.