Critics of the current approach argue that the state's reliance on reactive, police-led measures is insufficient to address the root causes of the violence. They contend that by focusing primarily on the aftermath of abuse, the system fails to provide the preventative care necessary to stop violence before it begins. This perspective suggests that the recurring spikes in violence during summer months are a clear indicator that the current model is not adapting to the changing realities of domestic life.
Many experts and activists point out that the bureaucratic nature of the current system can be a barrier for victims. The process of obtaining protection orders and navigating the legal system is often slow and intimidating, which may discourage women from seeking help until it is too late. Critics argue that the government needs to shift its focus toward community-based support programs that can intervene earlier, rather than waiting for a formal police report to trigger action.
There is also a concern regarding the lack of coordination between social services and law enforcement. Critics suggest that if these agencies worked more closely together, they could identify warning signs in families that are currently falling through the cracks. The current system is often described as fragmented, where information does not flow efficiently between the institutions responsible for safety and those responsible for social welfare.
Ultimately, the call is for a more holistic strategy that addresses the economic and social factors that keep victims trapped in abusive relationships. Without addressing issues like housing, employment, and social isolation, the government's efforts will continue to be limited in scope. The risk, according to this view, is that the state continues to manage the symptoms of the crisis while failing to implement the structural changes required to end it.