Proponents of the current agreement between the Spanish government and the Catholic Church argue that this framework represents the most pragmatic path toward healing for survivors. By establishing a neutral, state-led process under the Ombudsman, the initiative bypasses the limitations of the traditional judicial system, which often leaves victims of historical crimes without a legal remedy. Supporters emphasize that this model prioritizes the needs of the survivor over the complexities of litigation, offering a dignified route to recognition that was previously unavailable.
For many, the primary value of this protocol lies in its ability to force institutional engagement. By bringing the Church to the table, the government has ensured that the institution takes responsibility for its past failures. This is seen as a vital step in breaking the culture of silence that allowed abuse to persist for generations. Supporters point out that the inclusion of independent experts in the review process provides a layer of credibility and transparency that ensures claims are handled with the necessary sensitivity and rigor.
Furthermore, the focus on restorative justice—rather than just punitive measures—is viewed as a more effective way to address the long-term trauma of survivors. By providing financial support for therapy and formalizing apologies, the program acknowledges the reality of the harm caused. Advocates argue that while no amount of money can undo the past, this state-backed effort provides a necessary validation that the state and the Church finally acknowledge the suffering of those who were ignored for decades.