Proponents of the government's plan argue that the redistribution of unaccompanied minors is a necessary exercise in national responsibility and humanitarian duty. Given that Ceuta is a small territory with limited infrastructure, it is physically impossible for the city to provide long-term care for such a large number of children without external support. Supporters emphasize that the Spanish Constitution and existing laws mandate that the state must ensure the welfare of these minors, and that this obligation should be shared across all autonomous communities rather than falling solely on the border regions.
From this viewpoint, the 25 million euros in additional funding represents a clear commitment from the central government to mitigate the crisis. Advocates argue that by spreading the responsibility, Spain can ensure that every child receives proper education, healthcare, and integration services, which would be impossible if they remained concentrated in overcrowded, makeshift facilities. This approach is seen as a test of the country's institutional maturity and its ability to act as a unified state in the face of external pressures.
Furthermore, supporters point out that the European Union has recognized the necessity of this burden-sharing model. By demonstrating that Spain can manage its internal migration challenges effectively, the government strengthens its position in Brussels when negotiating for broader EU-wide migration policies. This perspective holds that political bickering between parties should not take precedence over the fundamental rights and safety of the children involved in this crisis.