Proponents of the current government strategy argue that the state is taking necessary, decisive steps to address the recent spike in violence. By publicly confirming and categorizing these crimes as gender-based, the administration is ensuring that these cases receive the specialized legal attention they require. This transparency is essential for maintaining public trust and ensuring that the judicial system remains focused on the specific dynamics of domestic abuse.
Supporters emphasize that the existing infrastructure, including the VioGén system for tracking risk levels, remains a vital tool for protecting thousands of women daily. They argue that the focus should be on refining these existing digital and human resources rather than dismantling a system that has prevented countless tragedies over the last two decades. Strengthening inter-agency cooperation between local police and social workers is seen as the most practical path forward.
Furthermore, advocates point to the importance of recent legislative updates that have expanded the definition of gender-based violence to include more forms of psychological and economic abuse. By continuing to invest in these comprehensive legal definitions, the government is better equipped to prosecute offenders and provide support to victims before physical violence occurs. This proactive approach is viewed as the most effective way to ensure long-term safety.
Ultimately, those backing the current institutional response believe that consistent funding and political will are the primary drivers of change. They argue that by staying the course and reinforcing current policies, the state can adapt to new challenges and provide a more secure environment for all citizens. The goal is to ensure that every victim has a clear, accessible path to safety through established state channels.