Proponents of the current 2030 World Cup bid argue that the partnership with Morocco and Portugal is a pragmatic and necessary strategy to secure a successful tournament. By pooling resources and infrastructure across three nations, the bid presents a robust and diverse plan that aligns with FIFA's modern requirements for global events. This collaborative approach not only eases the financial burden on any single host but also strengthens diplomatic ties and promotes tourism across the Mediterranean region.
From a business perspective, the inclusion of Morocco offers significant growth potential for the sport in North Africa. Supporters emphasize that the prestige of hosting the final in Spain would be a crowning achievement for the nation's sports infrastructure, particularly with the modernization of the Santiago Bernabéu. This investment is expected to yield long-term economic benefits, including job creation and improved public facilities that will serve the community well beyond the final whistle.
Furthermore, those backing the current arrangement point out that international sports governance requires compromise. By accepting a shared hosting model, Spain ensures its place at the center of the global football stage. The focus on securing the final for Madrid is seen as a reasonable goal that reflects Spain's historical contribution to the sport, while the potential for Morocco to host the 2029 Club World Cup serves as a fair trade-off that maintains the integrity of the overall agreement.
Ultimately, supporters believe that the focus should remain on the positive impact of the tournament. By maintaining a unified front, the host nations can deliver a world-class experience that celebrates the centennial of the World Cup while showcasing the best of Spanish culture and hospitality to a global audience.