Proponents of a robust security response argue that the recent surge in drug-related violence in cities like Nice necessitates a permanent and highly visible police presence. By deploying specialized units to designated zones, the state can disrupt the operational capacity of criminal networks that rely on controlling specific street corners and neighborhoods. Supporters emphasize that without a strong, proactive law enforcement strategy, these criminal organizations will continue to expand their influence, effectively holding local residents hostage to their turf battles. This approach is seen as essential to restoring the authority of the state and providing the necessary stability for families and businesses to function without fear.
Furthermore, advocates for this policy point out that the state has a fundamental duty to protect its citizens from the spillover effects of organized crime. When innocent bystanders are caught in the crossfire, as seen in the recent tragedy in the Moulins district, it becomes clear that traditional policing methods are insufficient. By increasing surveillance, conducting frequent patrols, and utilizing intelligence-led operations, law enforcement can deter violence before it erupts. This strategy is viewed not as a long-term solution to the root causes of crime, but as a critical, immediate measure to reclaim public spaces and ensure that the rule of law prevails over the interests of violent gangs.