Proponents of René Obermann’s vision argue that a unified European defense market is essential for survival in an increasingly volatile world. By moving away from national silos, Europe can eliminate the redundant development of military hardware, which currently drains billions of euros from public coffers. A consolidated approach would allow for the creation of standardized equipment that is interoperable across all member states, significantly improving the efficiency of joint military operations.
Beyond cost savings, a more integrated industry would foster a stronger technological base. When companies are forced to compete on a continental scale rather than relying on protected national markets, they are incentivized to innovate and improve quality. This shift would help European firms compete more effectively against global giants from the United States and China, ensuring that Europe maintains its own strategic capabilities rather than depending on foreign suppliers.
Furthermore, supporters point out that the current model of industrial nationalism is outdated. Modern warfare relies on complex, interconnected systems that require massive investment and specialized expertise. No single European nation possesses the resources to develop these technologies entirely on its own. By pooling talent and capital, Europe can create a defense ecosystem that is greater than the sum of its parts, providing a more robust deterrent against external threats.
Ultimately, this perspective views the integration of defense industries as a necessary evolution of the European project. It argues that the political benefits of sovereignty are outweighed by the practical risks of being left behind technologically. If Europe wants to be a credible global security actor, it must prioritize collective strength over the narrow interests of individual national industries.