Proponents of these meetings argue that direct engagement with Donald Trump is a pragmatic necessity for leaders like Zelensky and Netanyahu. In an era of unpredictable political shifts, maintaining a broad base of support across the American political spectrum is essential for national survival. By meeting with a candidate who commands a significant portion of the American electorate, these leaders are ensuring that their countries' interests remain on the agenda regardless of who occupies the White House in the future.
For Ukraine, the argument is that building a relationship with Trump is a vital insurance policy. Given the debates within the Republican Party regarding the scale of aid to Kyiv, Zelensky’s outreach is a proactive effort to demonstrate the strategic importance of Ukraine’s defense to American interests. It is a move designed to bridge potential divides and secure the continuity of essential military resources that are currently keeping the front lines stable.
Similarly, for Israel, the relationship with the United States is the cornerstone of its national security architecture. Netanyahu’s decision to meet with Trump reflects a desire to reinforce the historic bond between the two nations. Supporters suggest that such meetings help clarify expectations and align strategic goals, particularly regarding regional threats and the management of the conflict in Gaza. This is not merely about current politics, but about ensuring that the U.S.-Israel alliance remains robust and predictable.
Ultimately, this approach is viewed as responsible statecraft. Leaders who ignore major political figures in the United States risk being sidelined if those figures rise to power. By engaging now, Zelensky and Netanyahu are demonstrating a commitment to their nations' long-term security by preparing for all possible political outcomes in Washington.