Proponents of the new French law argue that it is a vital step toward reclaiming the digital environment for the next generation. By setting a clear age of 15 for social media access, the government is taking a proactive stance against the documented risks of excessive screen time, which include sleep disruption, anxiety, and exposure to harmful content. Supporters emphasize that the law is not merely a restriction but a necessary intervention to protect children's developing brains from the manipulative nature of engagement-driven algorithms.
Advocates also point to the "digital age of majority" as a standard that provides parents and educators with more leverage in managing children's online lives. By shifting the burden of age verification onto the platforms, the law forces tech companies to prioritize safety over rapid user growth. This is viewed as a significant shift in the power dynamic between global tech giants and national regulators, signaling that platforms can no longer operate without accountability for the well-being of their youngest users.
Furthermore, the use of a "double anonymity" verification system is defended as a sophisticated solution that protects privacy while ensuring safety. By utilizing third-party verification, the state aims to prevent platforms from collecting even more personal data on minors. For those who support the measure, the potential for a safer, less addictive digital landscape outweighs the logistical hurdles of implementation, setting a positive precedent for other nations to follow.