Supporters of United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres' call to lift sanctions against Syria argue that the measures are causing more harm than good, particularly to civilians. Humanitarian organizations and some diplomats contend that the sanctions have inadvertently crippled Syria's economy and hindered the flow of essential goods, including food, medicine, and fuel. The average Syrian citizen now struggles with hyperinflation and severe shortages, while the political objective of forcing regime change has largely stalled.
By lifting sanctions, the international community could enable a massive scale-up of aid delivery and pave the way for reconstruction. Proponents point out that sanctions relief would allow banks to process transactions for humanitarian supplies more easily, reducing delays and costs. It could also encourage other countries to contribute to rebuilding efforts, creating jobs and restoring basic services like electricity and water.
Furthermore, supporters argue that the Assad government remains in power and has shown little willingness to negotiate under pressure. Continuing sanctions only punishes the population, not the regime, and may fuel extremism and instability. A shift toward unconditional humanitarian support could open diplomatic channels and reduce tensions in the region. The UN chief's stance reflects a growing consensus among aid agencies that sanctions must be reassessed to prioritize civilian well-being.