France's proposed social media ban for under-15s is a bold but necessary response to growing evidence that early exposure to platforms harms children's mental health and safety. Research shows that teens who spend more than three hours a day on social media face double the risk of depression and anxiety. By requiring parental consent, the law respects family authority while creating a safer digital environment.
The ban targets specific harms: addictive algorithms that keep children scrolling, data collection that targets them with ads, and exposure to inappropriate content. Tech companies have shown little willingness to self-regulate, as their revenue depends on user engagement. Government action is therefore essential to protect a vulnerable population.
Some argue that the ban infringes on children's freedom of expression. But freedom comes with responsibility; children do not have the same capacity to assess risks as adults. Parental consent acts as a safeguard, not a veto. Moreover, children can still use messaging apps and educational platforms that are less risky.
Enforcement is a challenge, but fines of up to 4% of global revenue create strong incentives. Age verification technologies are improving, and the law can adapt over time. Other countries like Australia are watching France's move. If successful, this law could set a global standard for child online safety.