While the PNF’s request for a trial might appear as a strong anti-corruption move, there are reasons to be cautious. The investigation has dragged on for over a decade, and earlier judicial proceedings have been annulled on procedural grounds. This raises questions about whether the evidence will hold up in court. A rushed trial could waste public resources and unfairly tarnish reputations if the case is weak.
Another concern is selectivity. BNP Paribas has already faced heavy fines in the United States for violating sanctions against Iran, Sudan, and Cuba. Subjecting the bank to a separate criminal trial in France for alleged money-laundering activities risks double jeopardy, even if legally distinct. The bank’s shareholders and employees may be penalized for conduct that was not clearly illegal at the time. Meanwhile, the Bongo children argue that they inherited assets legitimately and that the family’s wealth predates Omar Bongo’s presidency.
Critics also suggest that the ‘ill-gotten gains’ approach has become a political tool. France has pursued cases against leaders from former colonies while leaving others unexamined. Gabon itself has seen political instability, and the timing of the PNF’s request could be seen as an attempt to pressure Gabon’s current leaders. If the case lacks solid proof of intent, it may reinforce perceptions that French justice is biased.
Moreover, even if a trial proceeds, it is not clear that Gabonese citizens will benefit. Recovered assets often go to state coffers with little oversight. The legal process itself is costly and lengthy. Without stronger safeguards, the fight against corruption could become a symbolic exercise rather than a practical remedy for the affected population.