News From Multiple Perspectives

Sunil Mittal asserts Bharti is ahead of Starlink in satellite broadband approval queue

Published October 14, 2026 at 10:33 AM UTC

Authored by
Every article published on DirectionFreeNews undergoes editorial review by our editorial team. Our editors research publicly available information from multiple trusted news organizations, compare differing perspectives, verify key facts, and publish balanced summaries intended to help readers better understand important events. Our editorial process is designed to reduce editorial bias by considering multiple reputable sources rather than relying on a single viewpoint

Sunil Bharti Mittal, chairman of Bharti Enterprises, has stated that Bharti Airtel’s satellite venture, Eutelsat OneWeb, is currently ahead of Elon Musk’s Starlink in the regulatory approval process for satellite broadband services in India. Speaking at a recent industry event, Mittal emphasized that his company has secured the necessary spectrum and regulatory clearances required to begin operations, positioning it to launch services ahead of global competitors.

Economic and Market Impact

The race for satellite broadband in India represents a significant shift in the telecommunications landscape. By targeting remote and underserved regions where traditional fiber-optic infrastructure is difficult to deploy, companies like Bharti and Starlink aim to capture a vast, untapped market. The early entry of OneWeb could provide a first-mover advantage in securing enterprise and government contracts, potentially influencing long-term market share in the digital connectivity sector.

Political and Community Impact

Satellite internet is viewed as a critical tool for bridging the digital divide in India. The government’s stance on spectrum allocation—specifically whether it should be auctioned or administratively assigned—has been a subject of intense debate. Bharti’s progress suggests that the current regulatory framework is facilitating domestic players, which aligns with broader national goals of self-reliance in critical technology infrastructure.

What Happens Next

The Department of Telecommunications is expected to finalize the guidelines for spectrum usage and licensing. While Bharti claims a lead, the final commercial rollout depends on the completion of remaining technical testing and the official issuance of operational licenses. Observers are now waiting for the government to clarify the final pricing and allocation mechanisms for satellite spectrum, which will dictate the competitive environment for all market participants.

Potential Benefits / Supporting Perspective

The Case for Prioritizing Domestic Satellite Infrastructure

Proponents of the current regulatory trajectory argue that prioritizing established domestic players like Bharti is a strategic necessity for national security and economic stability. By favoring companies that have long-standing commitments to the Indian market, the government ensures that critical communication infrastructure remains under the oversight of entities that are deeply integrated into the local regulatory and legal framework. This approach is seen as a way to foster a robust domestic ecosystem, encouraging local investment and job creation while ensuring that the rollout of satellite broadband adheres strictly to national standards. Supporters contend that this measured pace of approval allows for a more controlled integration of new technology, preventing market disruption and ensuring that the benefits of satellite connectivity are distributed in a manner that supports national digital inclusion targets without compromising sovereign control over data and communication networks.

Potential Drawbacks / Critical Perspective

Concerns Over Market Competition and Regulatory Transparency

Critics of the current regulatory process argue that the emphasis on 'who is ahead' in the approval queue masks deeper concerns regarding the transparency and fairness of the licensing process. Skeptics suggest that if the regulatory environment is perceived as favoring domestic incumbents, it could discourage foreign direct investment and limit the variety of technological solutions available to Indian consumers. There is a concern that by creating a bottleneck in the approval process, the government may inadvertently stifle the competitive pressure that global players like Starlink bring to the market. For many, the primary goal should be the rapid deployment of the most efficient technology, regardless of the company's origin. Critics warn that if the regulatory framework is not seen as neutral and merit-based, it could lead to a less competitive market, ultimately resulting in higher costs and slower innovation for the end-users who need connectivity the most.