Criticizing the persistence of long court vacations, many observers argue that the current system is out of touch with the realities of modern India. When the courts shut down for extended periods, it is the common citizen who bears the brunt of the delay. In a country where justice is already difficult to access, these closures act as an additional barrier that keeps people trapped in legal limbo for years.
The argument that judges need these breaks to write judgments is increasingly viewed as insufficient in an era of digital technology and administrative support. Critics point out that other essential services, such as hospitals and law enforcement, operate 24/7 without similar extended closures. If the judiciary is to be considered a public service, it must be held to the same standards of availability and accountability as other pillars of the state.
Furthermore, the economic impact of these delays is significant. Businesses are often stalled by pending litigation, and individuals lose income while waiting for their day in court. The perception that the judiciary prioritizes its own comfort over the urgent needs of the public undermines trust in the legal system. There is a strong call for a more flexible, year-round operational model that ensures the wheels of justice never stop turning.
Moving forward, the judiciary must prioritize transparency and efficiency. Whether through staggered vacations or the adoption of modern case management systems, the status quo is no longer acceptable. The public expects a system that works for them, not one that adheres to outdated traditions at the expense of their fundamental rights.