Warning against rushed anti-paper leak law

Critics caution that while the intent is sound, the bill's harsh provisions risk overreach and misuse. A 10-year maximum sentence for paper leaks is comparable to punishments for serious violent crimes, raising concerns about proportionality. The broad definition of 'unfair means' could be used to target minor infractions or even whistleblowers. The fast-track trials might compromise due process, especially for accused students who are often young and vulnerable. Without addressing root causes like exam administration flaws, digital security gaps, and the hyper-competitive environment, tougher laws alone may not stop leaks. The task force's centralized power could also bypass state jurisdiction, leading to friction. Several opposition members have demanded a detailed parliamentary committee review, arguing that the bill was tabled without sufficient consultation. They point out that past laws with similar penalties did not prevent the 2024 leaks. A better approach, they say, would combine stronger enforcement with exam process reforms.