Questioning the sustainability and enforcement of Trump's Gaza deal and Hamas disarmament

While the announcement of a Gaza deal involving Hamas disarmament marked by Donald Trump and the Board of Peace may appear promising, there are significant concerns about its feasibility and longevity. Disarmament agreements in Gaza have historically faced challenges due to deeply entrenched political rivalries, lack of trust, and limited enforcement capacity. Critics caution that without robust verification and consequences for violations, such agreements risk being undermined by spoilers or inadequate compliance. Additionally, Hamas remains a politically powerful group with substantial local support; pressing it to disarm could provoke internal resistance or fracture within Palestinian factions, risking renewed instability. The Board of Peace, as a new institution, may lack the influence and resources necessary to enforce terms effectively amidst the complex interests of regional actors. There is also apprehension that without parallel political solutions addressing underlying grievances, a security-focused deal may provide only a temporary pause rather than lasting peace. Observers urge a careful and realistic assessment of how disarmament unfolds in practice and emphasize the need for inclusive political dialogue beyond military agreements.