Supporters of the US government's proposed $100,000 fee for post-graduation work authorization argue that the measure aims to restore balance and fairness in immigration policy while ensuring resource sustainability. They emphasize that the program enabling international graduates to work in the country after their studies carries administrative and enforcement costs, which this fee would help cover.
Proponents see the fee as a deterrent against misuse of work authorization programs, preventing applicants who might otherwise remain without genuine employment intent. This measure could help focus resources on genuinely qualified candidates and reduce backlogs in visa processing.
Additionally, supporters argue that by introducing such a substantial fee, the government may encourage employers and institutions to reassess dependency on foreign workers, potentially incentivizing investment in domestic talent development. For the U.S. economy, such reform could ultimately improve job opportunities for American workers while maintaining an orderly immigration system.
From this perspective, the pause in implementation allows for dialogue but should not deter policymakers from following through. Supporters acknowledge that the fee is high but argue it reflects the real costs associated with managing complex immigration and labor challenges. They caution that without such measures, the system risks being overwhelmed and unsustainable in the long term.