Proponents of relocating protests away from Jantar Mantar argue that the current situation has become untenable for the residents and businesses in the immediate vicinity. The site, while historically significant, was never designed to accommodate the massive, sustained crowds that frequently gather there today. Supporters of the petition emphasize that the resulting noise pollution, traffic congestion, and sanitation issues create an unfair burden on the local population, who often find their daily routines severely disrupted.
From an administrative perspective, managing security and public safety at such a dense, open-air location is increasingly difficult for law enforcement. By moving protests to designated, purpose-built areas on the outskirts of the city, the government could provide a more controlled environment that ensures both the safety of the protesters and the smooth functioning of the capital's core. This approach is viewed as a necessary step toward modernizing urban management while still allowing citizens to exercise their democratic rights.
Furthermore, supporters point out that many other global cities have successfully implemented designated protest zones that minimize the impact on public infrastructure. By formalizing these spaces, the state can provide better facilities for demonstrators, such as water, sanitation, and shade, which are often lacking at Jantar Mantar. This shift would not be an attempt to silence dissent, but rather a practical adjustment to ensure that the city remains functional for all its inhabitants, including those who are not participating in the protests.