Proponents of the Supreme Court's directive argue that linking fuel access to insurance is a necessary step to enforce existing laws and protect the public. With over 16 crore vehicles currently uninsured, the current system fails to provide a safety net for those involved in road accidents. By making insurance a prerequisite for a basic necessity like fuel, the government can create a strong, automated incentive for owners to keep their policies active, thereby reducing the burden on the judicial system and ensuring victims are not left without recourse.
This technology-driven approach, utilizing ANPR cameras and real-time database integration, represents a modern shift toward digital governance. Supporters believe that moving away from manual, paper-based checks will reduce corruption and human error in traffic enforcement. By automating the identification of uninsured vehicles, authorities can focus their resources more effectively, ensuring that compliance is monitored consistently across the country rather than relying on sporadic roadside inspections.
Furthermore, the extension of mandatory insurance periods for new vehicles addresses the issue of policy lapses shortly after purchase. By requiring longer-term coverage, the policy ensures that vehicles remain insured for a significant portion of their early lifespan. This proactive measure is seen as a practical solution to the high rate of non-compliance, ultimately fostering a more responsible driving culture and strengthening the financial security of all road users.