Critics argue that the government's response to the exam leak row has been insufficient and lacks the urgency required to address the scale of the problem. By resisting calls for an independent investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation, the administration risks appearing as though it is protecting its own interests rather than the rights of the students. Many observers believe that only an external, impartial agency can uncover the depth of the corruption and hold those responsible for the leaks accountable.
For the students, the lack of a transparent, independent probe is a major point of contention that fuels ongoing protests. They argue that internal inquiries are often prone to bias and fail to address the systemic rot that allows paper leaks to occur repeatedly. The skepticism is rooted in a history of unfulfilled promises, leading many to believe that without a high-level, independent investigation, the cycle of corruption will continue unabated.
The political stakes are high, as the opposition has joined the call for accountability, framing the issue as a failure of governance. The refusal to hand over the case to a central agency is seen by many as a missed opportunity to demonstrate a genuine commitment to transparency. As the protests continue, the government faces increasing pressure to prove that it values the future of its youth over the convenience of maintaining control over the investigation process.