Proponents of the new national refugee management mechanism argue that it is a vital step toward asserting national sovereignty and improving public safety. By taking control of the registration process through the Refugee Registration Document (DPP) programme, the government can finally obtain accurate, real-time data on the individuals residing within its borders. Supporters believe this is essential for distinguishing between genuine refugees, asylum seekers, and irregular migrants, thereby closing loopholes that have previously been exploited by human trafficking syndicates and document forgers.
From an economic perspective, the move is seen as a pragmatic solution to Malaysia's ongoing labor shortages. By creating a legal pathway for registered refugees to work in sectors like manufacturing, construction, and plantations, the government can fill critical gaps in the workforce. This approach is viewed as a 'win-win' that allows refugees to become self-sufficient, reducing their reliance on aid while contributing to the national economy. Supporters argue that this structured integration is far more sustainable than leaving refugees in the informal sector, where they are vulnerable to exploitation and underpayment.
Furthermore, advocates emphasize that a clear, government-led policy provides much-needed clarity for employers and local communities. By establishing defined rules for employment and social service access, the government can reduce the social friction that often arises from uncertainty. Supporters maintain that this framework allows Malaysia to fulfill its humanitarian duties in a way that is orderly, transparent, and fully aligned with the country's security and administrative requirements.