Proponents of the current reform strategy argue that prioritizing internal administrative improvements is the most pragmatic way to address DBKL's immediate governance challenges. By focusing on the specific procedural weaknesses identified by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission, the agency is tackling the root causes of corruption—such as unclear licensing rules and inconsistent contract monitoring—rather than engaging in potentially disruptive legislative overhauls. This approach allows for rapid, measurable changes that can be implemented within existing legal frameworks.
Supporters also emphasize that the abolition of the Special One Stop Centre Committee and the expansion of portal access to MPs are significant moves toward transparency. These actions directly address concerns regarding political interference in development projects, ensuring that decision-making processes are more visible and subject to oversight. By standardizing these procedures, the agency creates a more stable environment for both businesses and residents, reducing the opportunities for bribery or favoritism that have historically plagued city administration.
Furthermore, the government’s decision to follow the recommendations of the IIUM study suggests a commitment to evidence-based policy. Rather than rushing into complex amendments of the Federal Capital Act 1960, which could have unintended consequences for the city's administrative stability, the current plan ensures that the foundation of the agency is strengthened first. This methodical approach is seen as a necessary step to restore public trust and ensure that any future structural changes are built upon a clean and efficient administrative base.