While the government emphasizes public order, critics and legal observers raise concerns about the potential for overreach in these recent enforcement actions. The Court of Appeal's decision to uphold the ban on Mentega Terbang has sparked debate regarding freedom of expression. Skeptics argue that the broad interpretation of 'public interest' under the Film Censorship Act grants the executive branch excessive power to suppress artistic works without sufficient transparency or a prior hearing for creators. This, they contend, creates a chilling effect on creative freedom and limits the public's access to diverse perspectives, which are vital for a healthy, democratic society.
Concerns also extend to the handling of the Network School in Forest City. While regulatory compliance is important, some observers worry that the intense scrutiny and public backlash may be driven by xenophobic sentiment rather than purely administrative concerns. The rush to shut down operations based on licensing technicalities, amid unverified allegations of Israeli participation, raises questions about whether the government is prioritizing political optics over a fair and objective investigation. Furthermore, the recurring issues of land disputes involving the Orang Asli suggest that the government’s focus on 'sovereignty' often overlooks the rights of indigenous communities. Critics argue that the state should be as diligent in protecting the ancestral land rights of its citizens as it is in enforcing business licenses for international startups. These incidents highlight a need for greater accountability and a more balanced approach that respects individual rights and minority interests alongside state security.