News From Multiple Perspectives

Court acquits Zizie Izette of three charges linked to RM2.8m bribery case

Published July 20, 2026 at 8:32 AM UTC

Authored by
Every article published on DirectionFreeNews undergoes editorial review by our editorial team. Our editors research publicly available information from multiple trusted news organizations, compare differing perspectives, verify key facts, and publish balanced summaries intended to help readers better understand important events. Our editorial process is designed to reduce editorial bias by considering multiple reputable sources rather than relying on a single viewpoint

The Kuala Lumpur High Court has granted a full acquittal to Zizie Izette Abdul Samad, the wife of Kinabatangan Member of Parliament Bung Moktar Radin, regarding three corruption charges. This decision follows the passing of her husband, which led the prosecution to discontinue the case against her. The charges were originally linked to an alleged RM2.8 million bribery scheme involving investments in unit trust funds.

Zizie Izette had been accused of abetting her husband in receiving bribes as an inducement to obtain approval for Felcra Berhad to invest RM150 million in Public Mutual unit trusts. The legal proceedings had been ongoing for several years, moving through various stages of the Malaysian court system. With the primary accused, Bung Moktar, no longer alive to face trial, the legal basis for the abetment charges against Zizie Izette was effectively removed.

In legal terms, an acquittal means the accused is cleared of the charges and cannot be tried again for the same offense. The court's decision brings a definitive end to this specific chapter of the high-profile case. The prosecution informed the court of their decision to drop the charges, and the judge subsequently ordered the discharge and acquittal of the defendant.

This development marks the conclusion of a long-standing legal battle that drew significant public attention due to the involvement of a prominent political figure and his spouse. While the case is now closed, it remains a notable example of how the death of a primary defendant can fundamentally alter the trajectory of complex corruption trials. The public and legal observers will likely view this as the final resolution of the matter.