Supporters of the current investment approach argue that KWAP must look beyond traditional domestic assets to ensure the long-term sustainability of pension funds. In an era of shifting global markets, diversifying into emerging industries like aquaculture is viewed as a necessary step to combat inflation and ensure competitive returns for retirees. Proponents suggest that while the RM200 million loss in eFishery is unfortunate, it represents a single data point in a much larger, generally successful portfolio.
From this viewpoint, the Prime Minister’s focus on improving internal vetting is a constructive response rather than an admission of systemic failure. By acknowledging the limitations of external audits, the government is signaling a shift toward a more hands-on, sophisticated investment culture. This evolution is seen as essential for any major fund aiming to remain relevant in a globalized economy where opportunities often lie in high-growth, high-risk sectors.
Furthermore, advocates emphasize that KWAP's mandate requires a balance between safety and growth. If the fund were to become overly risk-averse, it would fail to generate the yields necessary to support the growing number of retirees. Therefore, the focus should remain on refining risk management protocols rather than stifling the fund's ability to explore international opportunities. The government's commitment to oversight is viewed as a balanced approach that protects public interest while allowing for necessary economic expansion.