Proponents of expanding the GPS model to Sabah argue that a formal alliance between the two states is the most effective way to secure long-term development and autonomy. For decades, East Malaysian states have often felt sidelined by federal policies designed primarily for the needs of the peninsula. By pooling their parliamentary seats, Sabah and Sarawak could force federal leaders to pay closer attention to infrastructure, education, and healthcare gaps in the region.
This strategy is grounded in the success of GPS in Sarawak, which has managed to maintain a consistent development trajectory by keeping its political house in order. Supporters believe that if Sabah adopts a similar approach, it could move past the cycle of political instability that has historically hampered its progress. A unified bloc would provide a clear, singular mandate that federal authorities would find difficult to ignore when negotiating budgets or constitutional amendments.
Furthermore, this move is viewed as a necessary evolution of the Malaysia Agreement 1963. As the nation moves toward greater decentralization, having a powerful, unified voice from Borneo ensures that the states are not just participants in the federation, but equal partners. This alignment would allow for better coordination on issues like oil and gas royalties, infrastructure connectivity, and the protection of local cultural rights, creating a more balanced federal system that benefits all citizens in the region.