Supporters of Muhammad Sanusi argue that his remarks are a necessary defense of Malay historical rights and the foundational identity of the nation. From this viewpoint, acknowledging the unique status of the Malay community is not an act of exclusion, but a factual recognition of the country's historical roots. Proponents believe that in an era of rapid globalization and shifting demographics, it is essential for leaders to reaffirm the traditional character of the land to ensure that the Malay community does not feel sidelined in its own country.
For many who back this stance, the rhetoric is seen as a legitimate expression of political identity. They argue that the Malay community has historically been the primary custodian of the nation's culture and governance, and that this role should be protected. By asserting that the land is fundamentally Malay, Sanusi is seen as championing the interests of a demographic that feels its cultural influence is under threat from modern, secular, or pluralistic pressures.
Furthermore, supporters often point out that such statements are common in political discourse where leaders seek to mobilize their core supporters. They maintain that the backlash is disproportionate and driven by political opponents looking to discredit a popular leader. For these supporters, the priority is to maintain the political and social dominance of the Malay community, which they view as the bedrock of national stability and order.
Ultimately, this perspective emphasizes that national unity does not require the dilution of specific ethnic identities. Instead, they argue that a strong, confident Malay identity provides a stable foundation upon which the rest of the country can coexist. The focus remains on preserving the heritage and political primacy of the Malay people as the central pillar of the Malaysian state.