Supporters of Shafie Apdal argue that his remarks were made in the context of public interest and should not be construed as contempt of court. They believe that the conviction undermines freedom of speech and the right to discuss public matters openly.
They contend that the appeal is a necessary step to protect these fundamental rights and to ensure that politicians can engage in open discourse without fear of legal repercussions.
Supporters also point out Shafie's long-standing service to the Semporna constituency and his contributions to Malaysian politics, suggesting that his actions have been in the best interest of the public.
They hope that the appeal will result in a favorable outcome, reinforcing the importance of free speech in the political arena.