News From Multiple Perspectives

Questioning the Court of Appeal’s decision to uphold the stay on damages payments

Published July 31, 2026 at 8:32 AM UTC

Authored by
Every article published on DirectionFreeNews undergoes editorial review by our editorial team. Our editors research publicly available information from multiple trusted news organizations, compare differing perspectives, verify key facts, and publish balanced summaries intended to help readers better understand important events. Our editorial process is designed to reduce editorial bias by considering multiple reputable sources rather than relying on a single viewpoint

Critics question the Court of Appeal’s decision to uphold the government's stay on paying damages awarded to Koh and Amri, arguing that such delays undermine justice and prolong the suffering of victims. Koh and Amri were awarded substantial sums after courts found their detentions illegal, recognizing the harm they endured. By allowing the government to defer payment despite these rulings, the court risks sending a message that victims must wait indefinitely for compensation, which can erode public trust in the legal system’s fairness. This delay not only affects the individuals directly harmed but can also discourage others from seeking redress for unlawful treatment. Furthermore, postponing payment may be viewed as the government prioritizing financial considerations over accountability and timely justice. Observers warn that continued delays could undermine confidence in protections against state abuse and the effectiveness of judicial remedies.