The call by the Selangor Menteri Besar to address the shielding of undocumented individuals is a necessary step toward restoring the rule of law. Proponents of this stance argue that a country cannot function effectively if its immigration policies are bypassed by private citizens. By allowing undocumented individuals to remain hidden, the state loses its ability to ensure that everyone living within its borders is accounted for, which is essential for national security and public health planning.
From an administrative perspective, the current situation creates an unfair burden on local infrastructure. When large numbers of people live in informal housing, they often do not contribute to the tax base or utility fees that support the very services they use. This places an undue strain on local councils that are already struggling to maintain clean and safe environments for all residents. Enforcing these laws is not just about immigration; it is about ensuring that the state can provide adequate services to its registered population.
Furthermore, the government has a responsibility to prevent the exploitation of vulnerable groups. Often, the informal arrangements that allow refugees to stay are predatory, involving poor living conditions and low wages. By cracking down on these hidden networks, the state can potentially reduce the risk of human trafficking and labor abuse. Supporting the MB's position means prioritizing a structured, legal framework that protects both the integrity of the nation's borders and the welfare of those living within them.
Ultimately, the goal is to create a system where the state, rather than private individuals, determines who resides in the country. This clarity is vital for social cohesion and ensures that the government can fulfill its duty to maintain order for all citizens.