Advocates for a swift resolution to the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) issues argue that setting a December deadline is a necessary step to ensure accountability and maintain momentum. After nearly ten years of negotiations, supporters believe that a clear timeline prevents the process from becoming an indefinite cycle of meetings without tangible outcomes. By establishing a target date, the state government forces federal ministries and agencies to prioritize these long-standing constitutional obligations, ensuring that the promises made at the nation's founding are finally honored.
This approach is seen as vital for the economic and administrative stability of Sarawak and Sabah. Proponents point out that the successful resolution of issues like the Bintulu Port transfer and the increase in special grants demonstrates that progress is possible when there is political will. A firm deadline serves as a catalyst for the federal government to move beyond interim measures and address the core structural changes required for true autonomy. For many in East Malaysia, this is about restoring the state's rightful status as an equal partner in the federation, which directly impacts the quality of public services and local control over resources.
Furthermore, supporters argue that the current administration’s willingness to engage through the MA63 Implementation Action Council provides a unique window of opportunity. By pushing for a conclusion by year-end, Sarawak is effectively leveraging this collaborative environment to secure lasting benefits for its citizens. This strategy is viewed as a proactive, professional way to manage state-federal relations, moving away from past grievances toward a more mature and functional partnership that benefits the entire nation.